COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
BBY vs MNSO
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BBY scored 52.4, MNSO scored 66.9 — MNSO leads.
Compare another set
BBY
Best Buy Co., Inc.
52.4
$87.48 · $18.4B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
14.5
MNSO leads
MNSO
MINISO Group Holding Limited
66.9
$11.02 · $3.3B
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestMNSO11.1x
- Fastest growthMNSO+26.2%
- Strongest balance sheetMNSO1.04
- Highest qualityMNSO79 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueBBY-12%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
BBY
stronger →← stronger
MNSO
77
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
79
46
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
96
41
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
71
MNSO is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BBY
MNSO
$1.6bC+
FCF
—
+1.0%C
Rev
+26.2%A-
1.34B
D/E
1.04B
15.9xB+
P/E
11.1xA-
1.64C+
PEG
0.86B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
BBY
MNSO
12% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
—
~2%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
—
+7%
1-yr DCF upside
—
+13%
5-yr DCF upside
—
+22%
10-yr DCF upside
—
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
BBY
Why this score
- Durable high returns
MNSO
Why this score
- Short track record
- Foreign reporter (CNY)
The companies
BBYBest Buy Co., Inc.
Why now
Specialty Retail · market cap $18.4b. 4% off the 52-week high of $91.27. 20 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $82.90 (implying -5% upside).
Moat
ROE 37% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 140% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Dividend payout 71% of earnings on a 4.5% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. Net margin 2.7% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
MNSOMINISO Group Holding Limited
Why now
Specialty Retail · market cap $3.3b. Down 58% from 52-week high of $26.20 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +26% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.86 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 16 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $19.08 (implying +73% upside).
Moat
ROE 19% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Down 58% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where BBY and MNSO diverge
On the headline score the gap is 14.5 points in favor of MNSO. The widest single difference is Growth, where MNSO leads by 49.7 points.
- GrowthBBY 46.0 · MNSO 95.7MNSO +49.7
- ValueBBY 40.8 · MNSO 71.5MNSO +30.7
- QualityBBY 76.6 · MNSO 79.2level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.