COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
BBUC vs PAM
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BBUC scored 36.5, PAM scored 61.7 — PAM leads.
Compare another set
BBUC
Brookfield Business Corporation
36.5
$28.65 · $5.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
25.2
PAM leads
PAM
Pampa Energía S.A.
61.7
$79.52 · $4.3B
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestBBUC0.2x
- Fastest growthPAM+8.3%
- Strongest balance sheetPAM0.65
- Highest qualityPAM57 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueBBUC-72%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/S multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
BBUC
stronger →← stronger
PAM
35
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
57
14
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
64
98
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
65
PAM is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BBUC
PAM
$1.2bC+
FCF
-$12mF
-32.4%F
Rev
+8.3%B
2.96D
D/E
0.65B
0.2xA
P/S
2.3xB
—
PEG
0.50A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
BBUC
PAM
72% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
—
~-17%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
—
+175%
1-yr DCF upside
—
+259%
5-yr DCF upside
—
+423%
10-yr DCF upside
—
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
BBUC
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
- Short track record
PAM
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
BBUCBrookfield Business Corporation
Why now
Conglomerates · market cap $5.9b. Down 25% from 52-week high of $38.25 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue -32% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating. 8 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $38.81 (implying +35% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
D/E 2.96 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Revenue contracting -32% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Net margin 1.4% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
PAMPampa Energía S.A.
Why now
Conglomerates · market cap $4.3b. 16% off the 52-week high of $94.50. PEG 0.50 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $120.77 (implying +52% upside).
Moat
Net margin 33% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 19% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$12m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where BBUC and PAM diverge
On the headline score the gap is 25.2 points in favor of PAM. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthBBUC 14.1 · PAM 63.5PAM +49.4
- ValueBBUC 97.9 · PAM 65.2BBUC +32.7
- QualityBBUC 35.3 · PAM 56.6PAM +21.3
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.