COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
BBUC vs MMM
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BBUC scored 36.5, MMM scored 49.6 — MMM leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. MMM's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but BBUC's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
BBUC
Brookfield Business Corporation
36.5
$28.65 · $5.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
13.1
MMM leads
MMM
3M Company
49.6
$178.96 · $92.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthMMM+2.3%
- Strongest balance sheetBBUC2.96
- Highest qualityMMM71 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueBBUC-72%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
BBUC
stronger →← stronger
MMM
35
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
71
14
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
51
98
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
34
MMM is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BBUC
MMM
$1.2bC+
FCF
$4.0bB
-32.4%F
Rev
+2.3%C
2.96D
D/E
4.38D
0.2xA
P/S
—
—
PEG
1.82C+
—
P/E
31.7xB
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
BBUC
MMM
72% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
45% above
~-17%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~16%/yr
+175%
1-yr DCF upside
-37%
+259%
5-yr DCF upside
-31%
+423%
10-yr DCF upside
-23%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
BBUC
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
- Short track record
MMM
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
The companies
BBUCBrookfield Business Corporation
Why now
Conglomerates · market cap $5.9b. Down 25% from 52-week high of $38.25 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue -32% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating. 8 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $38.81 (implying +35% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
D/E 2.96 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Revenue contracting -32% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Net margin 1.4% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
MMM3M Company
Why now
Conglomerates · market cap $92.3b. 3% off the 52-week high of $184.90. 17 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $185.57 (implying +4% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 133% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined. $92.3b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
D/E 4.38 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Trailing P/E 32x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where BBUC and MMM diverge
On the headline score the gap is 13.1 points in favor of MMM. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueBBUC 97.9 · MMM 34.0BBUC +63.9
- GrowthBBUC 14.1 · MMM 50.5MMM +36.4
- QualityBBUC 35.3 · MMM 70.9MMM +35.6
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.