COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
BBUC vs HON
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BBUC scored 36.5, HON scored 49.9 — HON leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. HON's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but BBUC's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
BBUC
Brookfield Business Corporation
36.5
$28.65 · $5.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
13.4
HON leads
HON
Honeywell International Inc.
49.9
$215.90 · $68.4B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthHON+5.0%
- Strongest balance sheetHON1.85
- Highest qualityHON68 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueBBUC-72%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
BBUC
stronger →← stronger
HON
35
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
68
14
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
33
98
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
56
HON is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BBUC
HON
$1.2bC+
FCF
$4.0bB
-32.4%F
Rev
+5.0%C+
2.96D
D/E
1.85C
0.2xA
P/S
—
—
PEG
4.16D
—
P/E
8.2xA
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
BBUC
HON
72% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
25% below
~-17%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~5%/yr
+175%
1-yr DCF upside
+8%
+259%
5-yr DCF upside
+34%
+423%
10-yr DCF upside
+84%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
BBUC
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
- Short track record
HON
Why this score
- Durable high returns
The companies
BBUCBrookfield Business Corporation
Why now
Conglomerates · market cap $5.9b. Down 25% from 52-week high of $38.25 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue -32% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating. 8 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $38.81 (implying +35% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
D/E 2.96 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Revenue contracting -32% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Net margin 1.4% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
HONHoneywell International Inc.
Why now
Conglomerates · market cap $68.4b. 17% off the 52-week high of $260.28. 21 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $262.95 (implying +22% upside).
Moat
Net margin 22% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 44% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. $68.4b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where BBUC and HON diverge
On the headline score the gap is 13.4 points in favor of HON. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueBBUC 97.9 · HON 56.1BBUC +41.8
- QualityBBUC 35.3 · HON 68.0HON +32.7
- GrowthBBUC 14.1 · HON 32.6HON +18.5
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.