COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
BBUC vs GHC
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BBUC scored 36.5, GHC scored 38.3 — GHC leads.
Compare another set
BBUC
Brookfield Business Corporation
36.5
$28.65 · $5.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
1.8
GHC leads
GHC
Graham Holdings Company
38.3
$1,166.93 · $4.9B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthGHC+2.5%
- Strongest balance sheetGHC0.30
- Highest qualityGHC50 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueBBUC-72%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
BBUC
stronger →← stronger
GHC
35
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
50
14
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
27
98
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
42
GHC is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BBUC
GHC
$1.2bC+
FCF
$275mC
-32.4%F
Rev
+2.5%C
2.96D
D/E
0.30A-
0.2xA
P/S
—
—
PEG
4.04D
—
P/E
9.4xA
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
BBUC
GHC
72% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
10% above
~-17%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~2%/yr
+175%
1-yr DCF upside
-1%
+259%
5-yr DCF upside
-9%
+423%
10-yr DCF upside
-19%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
BBUC
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
- Short track record
GHC
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
BBUCBrookfield Business Corporation
Why now
Conglomerates · market cap $5.9b. Down 25% from 52-week high of $38.25 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue -32% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating. 8 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $38.81 (implying +35% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
D/E 2.96 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Revenue contracting -32% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Net margin 1.4% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
GHCGraham Holdings Company
Why now
Conglomerates · market cap $4.9b. 8% off the 52-week high of $1262.35.
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
ROE 6% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where BBUC and GHC diverge
On the headline score the gap is 1.8 points in favor of GHC. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueBBUC 97.9 · GHC 41.8BBUC +56.1
- QualityBBUC 35.3 · GHC 50.2GHC +14.9
- GrowthBBUC 14.1 · GHC 26.7GHC +12.6
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.