COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
BALL vs GEF-B
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BALL scored 60.3, GEF-B scored 54.3 — BALL leads.
Compare another set
BALL
Ball Corporation
60.3
$63.59 · $16.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
6.0
BALL leads
GEF-B
Greif, Inc.
54.3
$111.43 · $4.2B
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestBALL18.2x
- Fastest growthBALL+15.6%
- Strongest balance sheetGEF-B0.39
- Highest qualityBALL63 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
BALL
stronger →← stronger
GEF-B
63
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
59
74
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
57
47
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
48
BALL is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BALL
GEF-B
$827mC+
FCF
$188mC
+15.6%B+
Rev
+4.3%C+
1.31B
D/E
0.39A-
18.2xB
P/E
30.7xC
1.21B
PEG
0.67A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
BALL
GEF-B
9% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
6% above
~10%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~8%/yr
-18%
1-yr DCF upside
-14%
-8%
5-yr DCF upside
-6%
+10%
10-yr DCF upside
+9%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
BALL
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
GEF-B
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
The companies
BALLBall Corporation
Why now
Packaging & Containers · market cap $16.8b. 7% off the 52-week high of $68.29. Revenue growing +16%, comfortably above the S&P median. 14 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $72.57 (implying +14% upside).
Moat
ROE 17% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
GEF-BGreif, Inc.
Why now
Packaging & Containers · market cap $4.2b. Trading near 52-week high of $113.99 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. PEG 0.67 — paying under fair value for the growth rate.
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
Trading within 2% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction. Trailing P/E 31x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where BALL and GEF-B diverge
On the headline score the gap is 6.0 points in favor of BALL. The widest single difference is Growth, where BALL leads by 17.9 points.
- GrowthBALL 74.4 · GEF-B 56.5BALL +17.9
- QualityBALL 62.7 · GEF-B 58.9BALL +3.8
- ValueBALL 47.0 · GEF-B 48.2level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.