COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
BABA vs RVLV
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BABA scored 39.4, RVLV scored 65.9 — RVLV leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. RVLV's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but BABA's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
39.4
$118.47 · $284.0B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
26.5
RVLV leads
RVLV
Revolve Group, Inc.
65.9
$23.96 · $1.7B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthRVLV+10.8%
- Strongest balance sheetRVLV0.06
- Highest qualityRVLV61 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
BABA
stronger →← stronger
RVLV
44
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
61
38
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
76
66
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
62
RVLV is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BABA
RVLV
-$7.6bF
FCF
$28mC-
+2.7%C
Rev
+10.8%B
0.24A-
D/E
0.06A
1.8xC+
P/S
—
0.50A
PEG
1.08B+
—
P/E
23.3xB
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
BABA
RVLV
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
299% above
—
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~55%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
-81%
—
5-yr DCF upside
-75%
—
10-yr DCF upside
-64%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
BABA
Why this score
- Foreign reporter (CNY)
RVLV
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
BABAAlibaba Group Holding Limited
Why now
Internet Retail · market cap $284.0b. Down 39% from 52-week high of $192.67 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.50 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 39 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $188.37 (implying +59% upside).
Moat
$284.0b market cap places it among the largest companies in the sector — distribution, R&D, and customer-acquisition costs amortize across a base peers can't replicate.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$7.6b) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Down 39% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. E-commerce competition — Amazon, Walmart, Shein, and Temu have each forced the rest of the category to compete on price, fulfillment speed, or assortment; sustaining margins requires one of those being structurally defended.
RVLVRevolve Group, Inc.
Why now
Internet Retail · market cap $1.7b. Down 24% from 52-week high of $31.68 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $30.85 (implying +29% upside).
Moat
ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Beta 1.64 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. E-commerce competition — Amazon, Walmart, Shein, and Temu have each forced the rest of the category to compete on price, fulfillment speed, or assortment; sustaining margins requires one of those being structurally defended.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where BABA and RVLV diverge
On the headline score the gap is 26.5 points in favor of RVLV. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthBABA 37.9 · RVLV 75.6RVLV +37.7
- QualityBABA 44.3 · RVLV 61.4RVLV +17.1
- ValueBABA 66.0 · RVLV 61.7BABA +4.3
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.