COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
AZZ vs VRSK
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. AZZ scored 64.7, VRSK scored 69.0 — VRSK leads.
Compare another set
AZZ
AZZ Inc.
64.7
$141.28 · $4.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
4.3
VRSK leads
VRSK
Verisk Analytics, Inc.
69
$190.15 · $24.7B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestAZZ21.5x
- Fastest growthVRSK+5.9%
- Highest qualityVRSK82 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueVRSK-12%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
AZZ
stronger →← stronger
VRSK
69
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
82
68
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
71
58
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
57
VRSK is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
AZZ
VRSK
$169mC
FCF
$1.1bC+
+5.7%C+
Rev
+5.9%C+
0.39B+
D/E
—
21.5xB+
P/E
29.2xB
1.20B+
PEG
1.77C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
AZZ
VRSK
58% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
12% below
~19%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~5%/yr
-42%
1-yr DCF upside
0%
-37%
5-yr DCF upside
+13%
-28%
10-yr DCF upside
+37%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
AZZ
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
VRSK
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
The companies
AZZAZZ Inc.
Why now
Specialty Business Services · market cap $4.2b. 13% off the 52-week high of $162.20. 9 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $164.00 (implying +16% upside).
Moat
ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
VRSKVerisk Analytics, Inc.
Why now
Consulting Services · market cap $24.7b. Down 31% from 52-week high of $273.83 — deep drawdown territory. 17 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $237.71 (implying +25% upside).
Moat
Net margin 29% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. FCF converts 124% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 31% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. ROE -78% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where AZZ and VRSK diverge
On the headline score the gap is 4.3 points in favor of VRSK. The widest single difference is Quality, where VRSK leads by 12.8 points.
- QualityAZZ 69.3 · VRSK 82.1VRSK +12.8
- GrowthAZZ 67.9 · VRSK 70.6level
- ValueAZZ 57.6 · VRSK 56.6level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.