COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026

AZZ vs KFY

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. AZZ scored 64.7, KFY scored 71.7 — KFY leads.
Compare another set
AZZ
AZZ Inc.
Specialty Business Services · Quality-Growth
64.7
$141.28 · $4.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
7.0
KFY leads
KFY
Korn Ferry
Staffing & Employment Services · Quality-Growth
71.7
$85.06 · $4.4B
fundamentals as of
  • CheapestKFY16.3x
  • Fastest growthKFY+6.4%
  • Strongest balance sheetKFY0.30
  • Highest qualityKFY77 / 100
  • Largest discount to fair valueKFY-8%
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD64.7/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY69.3GROWTH67.9VALUE57.6
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD71.7/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY76.6GROWTH68.2VALUE70.6
AZZKFYQuality69.376.6Growth67.968.2Value57.670.6
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)-4%16%11x27xAZZKFY

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

FCFAZZ$169mKFY$324m
RevAZZ+5.7%KFY+6.4%
D/EAZZ0.39KFY0.30
P/EAZZ21.5xKFY16.3x
PEGAZZ1.20KFY1.20
AZZ
stronger →← stronger
KFY
69
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
77
68
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
68
58
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
71
KFY is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
AZZ
KFY
$169mC
FCF
$324mC
+5.7%C+
Rev
+6.4%C+
0.39B+
D/E
0.30A-
21.5xB+
P/E
16.3xA-
1.20B+
PEG
1.20B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
AZZ
KFY
58% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
8% below
~19%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~4%/yr
-42%
1-yr DCF upside
+0%
-37%
5-yr DCF upside
+8%
-28%
10-yr DCF upside
+21%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
AZZ
Why this score
  • Raising its dividend
KFY
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
  • Raising its dividend
AZZAZZ Inc.
Specialty Business Services · $141.28 · beta 1.12
Why now
Specialty Business Services · market cap $4.2b. 13% off the 52-week high of $162.20. 9 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $164.00 (implying +16% upside).
Moat
ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
KFYKorn Ferry
Staffing & Employment Services · $85.06 · beta 1.20
Why now
Staffing & Employment Services · market cap $4.4b. Trading near 52-week high of $85.97 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. 4 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $81.00 (implying -5% upside).
Moat
ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 115% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trading within 1% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where AZZ and KFY diverge

On the headline score the gap is 7.0 points in favor of KFY. The widest single difference is Value, where KFY leads by 13.0 points.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.