COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
AZO vs LKQ
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. AZO scored 48.0, LKQ scored 60.5 — LKQ leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. LKQ's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but AZO's are as of August 2025 — a 10-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
AZO
AutoZone, Inc.
48
$3,009.44 · $49.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
12.5
LKQ leads
LKQ
LKQ Corporation
60.5
$25.74 · $6.5B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestLKQ14.3x
- Fastest growthAZO+2.4%
- Highest qualityLKQ65 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueLKQ-53%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
AZO
stronger →← stronger
LKQ
59
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
65
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
37
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
69
LKQ is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
AZO
LKQ
$1.8bC+
FCF
$625mC+
+2.4%C
Rev
+1.3%C
—
D/E
0.82B
20.3xB
P/E
14.3xA-
1.34B
PEG
0.92B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
AZO
LKQ
41% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
53% below
~19%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-8%/yr
-40%
1-yr DCF upside
+83%
-29%
5-yr DCF upside
+114%
-11%
10-yr DCF upside
+169%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
AZO
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Cyclical growth
LKQ
Why this score
- Durable high returns
The companies
AZOAutoZone, Inc.
Why now
Auto Parts · market cap $49.1b. Down 31% from 52-week high of $4388.11 — deep drawdown territory. 23 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $3,951 (implying +31% upside).
Moat
Net margin 13% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent.
Risk
Down 31% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. ROE -90% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
LKQLKQ Corporation
Why now
Auto Parts · market cap $6.5b. Down 31% from 52-week high of $37.13 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.92 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $32.50 (implying +26% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 136% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 31% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Net margin 3.4% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE 7% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where AZO and LKQ diverge
On the headline score the gap is 12.5 points in favor of LKQ. The widest single difference is Value, where LKQ leads by 31.3 points.
- ValueAZO 37.3 · LKQ 68.6LKQ +31.3
- QualityAZO 59.2 · LKQ 64.6LKQ +5.4
- GrowthAZO 50.0 · LKQ 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.