COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
AXIA vs NJR
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. AXIA scored 72.0, NJR scored 63.2 — AXIA leads.
Compare another set
AXIA
Axia Energia SA
72
$10.12 · —
Score gap
8.8
AXIA leads
NJR
New Jersey Resources Corporation
63.2
$53.52 · $5.4B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestNJR14.8x
- Fastest growthAXIA+12.1%
- Strongest balance sheetAXIA0.63
- Highest qualityNJR77 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueNJR-26%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
AXIA
stronger →← stronger
NJR
74
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
77
80
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
48
89
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
68
AXIA is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
AXIA
NJR
—
FCF
$359mC
+12.1%B+
Rev
+7.0%C+
0.63B
D/E
1.47B
12.4xB+
P/E
14.8xA-
—
PEG
2.13C
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
AXIA
NJR
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
26% below
—
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-7%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
+46%
—
5-yr DCF upside
+35%
—
10-yr DCF upside
+20%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
AXIA
Why this score
- Short track record
NJR
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
The companies
AXIAAxia Energia SA
Why now
Utilities · market cap $0. Down 86% from 52-week high of $74.52 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +12%, comfortably above the S&P median.
Moat
Net margin 21% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close.
Risk
Down 86% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
NJRNew Jersey Resources Corporation
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Gas · market cap $5.4b. 12% off the 52-week high of $60.86. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $60.00 (implying +12% upside).
Moat
Net margin 24% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 98% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Commodity exposure — earnings power tracks the price of the underlying commodity, not management execution. A 15-20% move in the commodity reprices the equity well before fundamentals catch up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where AXIA and NJR diverge
On the headline score the gap is 8.8 points in favor of AXIA. The widest single difference is Growth, where AXIA leads by 31.8 points.
- GrowthAXIA 80.2 · NJR 48.4AXIA +31.8
- ValueAXIA 89.4 · NJR 68.0AXIA +21.4
- QualityAXIA 74.2 · NJR 76.6level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.