COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
AXIA vs CIG
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. AXIA scored 72.0, CIG scored 83.0 — CIG leads.
Compare another set
AXIA
Axia Energia SA
72
$10.12 · —
Score gap
11.0
CIG leads
CIG
Comp En De Mn Cemig
83
$1.92
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestCIG6.2x
- Fastest growthAXIA+12.1%
- Strongest balance sheetCIG0.78
- Highest qualityAXIA74 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
AXIA
CIG
—
FCF
$354mC
+12.1%B+
Rev
+8.1%B
0.63B
D/E
0.78A
12.4xB+
P/E
6.2xA
—
PEG
0.33A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Model signals
AXIA
Why this score
- Short track record
CIG
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
AXIAAxia Energia SA
Why now
Utilities · market cap $0. Down 86% from 52-week high of $74.52 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +12%, comfortably above the S&P median.
Moat
Net margin 21% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close.
Risk
Down 86% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
CIGComp En De Mn Cemig
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Electric · market cap n/a. Down 30% from 52-week high of $2.76 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.33 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 3 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $2.14 (implying +11% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 26% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Down 30% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Dividend payout 80% of earnings on a 9.2% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.