COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
AEP vs AXIA
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. AEP scored 63.3, AXIA scored 72.0 — AXIA leads.
Compare another set
AEP
American Electric Power Company, Inc.
63.3
$120.94 · $65.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
8.7
AXIA leads
AXIA
Axia Energia SA
72
$10.12 · —
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthAXIA+12.1%
- Strongest balance sheetAXIA0.63
- Highest qualityAXIA74 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
AEP
stronger →← stronger
AXIA
48
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
74
84
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
80
64
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
89
AXIA is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
AEP
AXIA
-$2.4bF
FCF
—
+10.9%B
Rev
+12.1%B+
1.61C+
D/E
0.63B
2.9xB
P/S
—
2.15C
PEG
—
—
P/E
12.4xB+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Model signals
AEP
Why this score
- Short track record
AXIA
Why this score
- Short track record
The companies
AEPAmerican Electric Power Company, Inc.
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Electric · market cap $65.8b. 14% off the 52-week high of $140.58. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. 20 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $144.20 (implying +19% upside).
Moat
Net margin 14% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 10% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. $65.8b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$2.4b) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk.
AXIAAxia Energia SA
Why now
Utilities · market cap $0. Down 86% from 52-week high of $74.52 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +12%, comfortably above the S&P median.
Moat
Net margin 21% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close.
Risk
Down 86% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where AEP and AXIA diverge
On the headline score the gap is 8.7 points in favor of AXIA. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityAEP 47.6 · AXIA 74.2AXIA +26.6
- ValueAEP 63.7 · AXIA 89.4AXIA +25.7
- GrowthAEP 83.9 · AXIA 80.2AEP +3.7
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.