COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
AWR vs CIG
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. AWR scored 56.7, CIG scored 83.0 — CIG leads.
Compare another set
AWR
American States Water Company
56.7
$88.63 · $3.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
26.3
CIG leads
CIG
Comp En De Mn Cemig
83
$1.92
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestCIG6.2x
- Fastest growthAWR+13.2%
- Strongest balance sheetCIG0.78
- Highest qualityAWR64 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
AWR
CIG
$21mC-
FCF
$354mC
+13.2%B+
Rev
+8.1%B
0.82A-
D/E
0.78A
24.2xC
P/E
6.2xA
2.98C
PEG
0.33A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
AWR
CIG
648% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
—
~55%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
—
-87%
1-yr DCF upside
—
-87%
5-yr DCF upside
—
-87%
10-yr DCF upside
—
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
AWR
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Diluting shareholders
CIG
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
AWRAmerican States Water Company
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Water · market cap $3.5b. Trading near 52-week high of $90.42 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue growing +13%, comfortably above the S&P median.
Moat
Net margin 21% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Trading within 2% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction.
CIGComp En De Mn Cemig
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Electric · market cap n/a. Down 30% from 52-week high of $2.76 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.33 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 3 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $2.14 (implying +11% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 26% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Down 30% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Dividend payout 80% of earnings on a 9.2% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.