COMPARE · Reviewed July 29, 2026
AVY vs SLGN
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. AVY scored 52.0, SLGN scored 59.8 — SLGN leads.
Compare another set
AVY
Avery Dennison Corp
52
$174.12 · $14.2B
Score gap
7.8
SLGN leads
SLGN
Silgan Holdings Inc.
59.8
$41.09 · $4.3B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
AVY
stronger →← stronger
SLGN
70
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
54
48
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
74
42
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
54
SLGN is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
AVY
SLGN
$873mC+
FCF
$307mC
+4.8%C+
Rev
+9.6%B
1.66C
D/E
2.01C
18.5xB
P/E
15.4xA-
3.88D
PEG
0.79A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
AVY
SLGN
10% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
36% below
~1%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-5%/yr
+8%
1-yr DCF upside
+48%
+11%
5-yr DCF upside
+57%
+15%
10-yr DCF upside
+71%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
AVY
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Short track record
SLGN
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
The companies
AVYAvery Dennison Corp
Why now
Packaging · market cap $14.2b. 13% off the 52-week high of $199.54.
Moat
ROE 31% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
SLGNSilgan Holdings Inc.
Why now
Packaging & Containers · market cap $4.3b. 17% off the 52-week high of $49.55. PEG 0.79 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $54.77 (implying +33% upside).
Moat
ROE 12% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 108% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
D/E 2.01 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Net margin 4.3% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.