COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026

AVGO vs ICHR

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. AVGO scored 72.2, ICHR scored 41.5 — AVGO leads.
Compare another set
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
Semiconductors · Quality-Growth
72.2
$368.45 · $1.8T
fundamentals as of
Score gap
30.7
AVGO leads
ICHR
Ichor Holdings, Ltd.
Semiconductor Equipment & Materials · Quality-Growth
41.5
$60.20 · $2.3B
fundamentals as of
  • Fastest growthAVGO+32.3%
  • Strongest balance sheetICHR0.18
  • Highest qualityAVGO80 / 100
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD72.2/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY79.7GROWTH93.1VALUE50.7
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD41.5/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY21.3GROWTH51.6VALUE65.0
AVGOICHRQuality79.721.3Growth93.151.6Value50.765.0
FCFAVGO$32.8bICHR-$26m
RevAVGO+32.3%ICHR+9.1%
D/EAVGO0.74ICHR0.18
PEGAVGO0.41ICHR0.55
AVGO
stronger →← stronger
ICHR
80
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
21
93
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
52
51
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
65
AVGO is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
AVGO
ICHR
$32.8bA
FCF
-$26mF
+32.3%A
Rev
+9.1%B
0.74C+
D/E
0.18B+
61.3xC
P/E
0.41A
PEG
0.55A-
P/S
2.2xA-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
AVGO
ICHR
215% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
~47%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
-76%
1-yr DCF upside
-68%
5-yr DCF upside
-54%
10-yr DCF upside
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
AVGO
Why this score
  • Raising its dividend
ICHR
Why this score
  • Diluting shareholders
AVGOBroadcom Inc.
Semiconductors · $368.45 · beta 1.47
Why now
Semiconductors · market cap $1.8T. Down 26% from 52-week high of $495.00 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +32% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.41 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 45 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $527.88 (implying +43% upside).
Moat
Net margin 39% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 33% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 112% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 61.3x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Beta 1.47 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. P/S 23.2x embeds aggressive forward growth — disappointing top-line guidance would compress the multiple hard.
ICHRIchor Holdings, Ltd.
Semiconductor Equipment & Materials · $60.20 · beta 1.85
Why now
Semiconductor Equipment & Materials · market cap $2.3b. Down 47% from 52-week high of $113.58 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.55 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 7 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $95.86 (implying +59% upside).
Moat
Semiconductor moat is process-design IP plus customer qualification timelines — once designed in, the company captures multiple product cycles before a competitor can displace.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$26m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Currently unprofitable (margin -4.0%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Down 47% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where AVGO and ICHR diverge

On the headline score the gap is 30.7 points in favor of AVGO. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.