Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. AU scored 71.7, WPM scored 50.1 — AU leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. AU's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but WPM's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
AU
AngloGold Ashanti plc
Gold · Quality-Growth
71.7
$94.16 · $47.6B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
21.6
AU leads
WPM
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
Gold · Quality-Growth
50.1
$138.65 · $63.0B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
Fastest growthWPM+80.2%
Strongest balance sheetAU0.17
Highest qualityAU91 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueAU-64%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
AU
stronger →← stronger
WPM
91
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
63
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
81
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
40
AU is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
AU
WPM
$4.5bB
FCF
-$2.9bF
+70.8%A
Rev
+80.2%A
0.17B+
D/E
0.20B+
12.6xA-
P/E
—
0.78A-
PEG
0.43A
—
P/S
27.2xD
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
AU
WPM
64% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
—
~-9%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
—
+110%
1-yr DCF upside
—
+174%
5-yr DCF upside
—
+311%
10-yr DCF upside
—
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
AU
Why this score
Raising its dividend
Cyclical growth
WPM
Why this score
Raising its dividend
Cyclical growth
The companies
AUAngloGold Ashanti plc
Gold · $94.16 · beta 0.74
Why now
Gold · market cap $47.6b. Down 27% from 52-week high of $129.14 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +71% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.78 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $117.50 (implying +25% upside).
Moat
Net margin 32% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 45% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 117% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Reserve-replacement treadmill — every barrel or ounce extracted has to be replaced through exploration or acquisition; underspending on replacement reserves shows up in production declines 2-3 years out.
WPMWheaton Precious Metals Corp.
Gold · $138.65 · beta 1.24
Why now
Gold · market cap $63.0b. 16% off the 52-week high of $165.76. Revenue growing +80% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.43 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $178.51 (implying +29% upside).
Moat
Net margin 64% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 17% is above 15% — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. $63.0b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$2.9b) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Trailing P/E 31x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. P/S 27.2x embeds aggressive forward growth — disappointing top-line guidance would compress the multiple hard.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where AU and WPM diverge
On the headline score the gap is 21.6 points in favor of AU. The widest single difference is Value, where AU leads by 41.1 points.
ValueAU 81.1 · WPM 40.0AU +41.1
QualityAU 91.0 · WPM 62.7AU +28.3
GrowthAU 50.0 · WPM 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is AU or WPM the better stock?
AU scores higher: AU 71.7, WPM 50.1 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do AU and WPM differ most?
The widest gap is value, where AU leads by 41 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. AU also leads quality, while growth is effectively level between them.
How are AU and WPM scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.