COMPARE · Reviewed July 2, 2026

AU vs OGC

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. AU scored 68.8, OGC scored 72 — OGC ahead by 3.200000000000003.
AU
AngloGold Ashanti plc
Gold · Quality-Growth
68.8
$84.65
Score gap
3.200000000000003
OGC leads
OGC
OceanaGold Corporation
Gold · Quality-Growth
72
$26.10
AUAngloGold Ashanti plc
Gold · $84.65 · beta 0.64
Why now
Gold · market cap $42.8b. Down 34% from 52-week high of $129.14 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +71% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.78 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $118.38 (implying +40% upside).
Moat
Net margin 31% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 43% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 121% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 34% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Reserve-replacement treadmill — every barrel or ounce extracted has to be replaced through exploration or acquisition; underspending on replacement reserves shows up in production declines 2-3 years out.
OGCOceanaGold Corporation
Gold · $26.10 · beta 1.47
Why now
Gold · market cap $5.8b. Down 40% from 52-week high of $43.33 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +46% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.17 — paying under fair value for the growth rate.
Moat
Net margin 34% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 35% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. Mining moat is reserve quality + extraction cost per unit — top-quartile cost producers generate cash through the commodity cycle while marginal producers burn it.
Risk
Down 40% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 1.47 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Reserve-replacement treadmill — every barrel or ounce extracted has to be replaced through exploration or acquisition; underspending on replacement reserves shows up in production declines 2-3 years out.
AUComponentOGC
B80FCFC+70
A95RevA95
B+85D/EA95
A-90P/E or P/SA95
A-90PEGA95
Supplemental signals · feed the score, not on the row card
A-90FCF YieldA95
A95ROEA95
89.4Base composite91.8
AU
compounder synergy (FCF yield ≥5% + ROE ≥15% + D/E <1)+4
GARP sweet spot (PEG <1, positive FCF)+1
analyst consensus bullish (88% buy/strong-buy)+2
forward P/E cheaper (12 → 8)+1
DCF cross-check (avg upside 157%)+2
stacked-bonus cap (+10 → 9.8)-0.15153137095996172
Total+9.848468629040038
OGC
compounder synergy (FCF yield ≥5% + ROE ≥15% + D/E <1)+4
GARP sweet spot (PEG <1, positive FCF)+1
DCF cross-check (avg upside 120%)+2
Total+7
AU upsideHorizonOGC upside
+120%1Y+57%
+150%5Y+105%
+201%10Y+197%
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.