COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
ATS vs EPAC
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ATS scored 27.4, EPAC scored 78.8 — EPAC leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. EPAC's fundamentals are as of May 2026, but ATS's are as of March 2025 — a 14-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
ATS
ATS Corporation
27.4
$19.74 · $1.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
51.4
EPAC leads
EPAC
Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
78.8
$37.25 · $1.9B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestEPAC21.2x
- Fastest growthEPAC+4.3%
- Strongest balance sheetEPAC0.44
- Highest qualityEPAC86 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueATS-34%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ATS
stronger →← stronger
EPAC
35
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
86
14
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
61
47
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
92
EPAC is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ATS
EPAC
$149mC
FCF
$112mC
-16.5%F
Rev
+4.3%C+
0.78B
D/E
0.44B+
56.4xD
P/E
21.2xB+
2.09C
PEG
0.34A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ATS
EPAC
34% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
12% below
~4%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~4%/yr
+16%
1-yr DCF upside
+3%
+52%
5-yr DCF upside
+14%
+123%
10-yr DCF upside
+31%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ATS
Why this score
- Foreign reporter (CAD)
EPAC
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
The companies
ATSATS Corporation
Why now
Specialty Industrial Machinery · market cap $1.9b. Down 45% from 52-week high of $35.82 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue -16% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating.
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Trailing P/E 56.4x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Revenue contracting -16% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Currently unprofitable (margin -1.1%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk.
EPACEnerpac Tool Group Corp.
Why now
Specialty Industrial Machinery · market cap $1.9b. 17% off the 52-week high of $45.00. PEG 0.34 — paying under fair value for the growth rate.
Moat
Net margin 15% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 22% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 120% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ATS and EPAC diverge
On the headline score the gap is 51.4 points in favor of EPAC. The widest single difference is Quality, where EPAC leads by 50.8 points.
- QualityATS 35.4 · EPAC 86.2EPAC +50.8
- GrowthATS 14.3 · EPAC 61.4EPAC +47.1
- ValueATS 47.4 · EPAC 92.3EPAC +44.9
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.