COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
ATO vs CIG
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ATO scored 54.2, CIG scored 83.0 — CIG leads.
Compare another set
ATO
Atmos Energy Corporation
54.2
$166.85 · $28.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
28.8
CIG leads
CIG
Comp En De Mn Cemig
83
$1.92
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthCIG+8.1%
- Strongest balance sheetATO0.68
- Highest qualityATO54 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ATO
CIG
-$2.0bF
FCF
$354mC
+6.5%C+
Rev
+8.1%B
0.68A
D/E
0.78A
5.7xD
P/S
—
2.07C
PEG
0.33A
—
P/E
6.2xA
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Model signals
ATO
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Diluting shareholders
CIG
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
ATOAtmos Energy Corporation
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Gas · market cap $28.2b. 13% off the 52-week high of $192.51. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $188.73 (implying +13% upside).
Moat
Net margin 28% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$2.0b) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Hedge-book exposure — many commodity producers hedge forward production; if the hedge book is concentrated at prices well below spot, the upside the market expects is already locked away.
CIGComp En De Mn Cemig
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Electric · market cap n/a. Down 30% from 52-week high of $2.76 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.33 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 3 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $2.14 (implying +11% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 26% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Down 30% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Dividend payout 80% of earnings on a 9.2% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.