COMPARE · Data as of August 14, 2026
ATEX vs TMUS
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ATEX scored 61.4, TMUS scored 71.6 — TMUS leads.
Compare another set
ATEX
Anterix Inc.
61.4
$91.53 · $1.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
10.2
TMUS leads
TMUS
T-Mobile US, Inc.
71.6
$182.61 · $195.9B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ATEX
stronger →← stronger
TMUS
78
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
74
44
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
74
68
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
67
ATEX and TMUS split the three pillars evenly.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ATEX
TMUS
$11mC-
FCF
$18.4bA-
+7.8%B
Rev
+9.7%B
0.01A
D/E
2.14C
26.2xC+
P/E
19.1xB
0.25A
PEG
0.82B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ATEX
TMUS
532% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
48% below
>60%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-5%/yr
-88%
1-yr DCF upside
+59%
-84%
5-yr DCF upside
+94%
-76%
10-yr DCF upside
+158%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ATEX
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
TMUS
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
The companies
ATEXAnterix Inc.
Why now
Telecom Services · market cap $1.8b. 19% off the 52-week high of $113.00. PEG 0.25 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 3 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $112.33 (implying +23% upside).
Moat
ROE 23% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
TMUST-Mobile US, Inc.
Why now
Telecom Services · market cap $195.9b. Down 30% from 52-week high of $261.56 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.82 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 25 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $243.08 (implying +33% upside).
Moat
ROE 19% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 174% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined. $195.9b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
D/E 2.14 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Down 30% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
TMUS leads ATEX by 10.2 points (71.6 to 61.4), its sharpest advantage coming in FCF (grade A-). A contrarian could still prefer ATEX for its stronger D/E (grade A).
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ATEX and TMUS diverge
On the headline score the gap is 10.2 points in favor of TMUS. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthATEX 44.2 · TMUS 73.9TMUS +29.7
- QualityATEX 77.6 · TMUS 73.6ATEX +4.0
- ValueATEX 67.7 · TMUS 67.4level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.