Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ATEX scored 51.4, KYIV scored 72.0 — KYIV leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. ATEX's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but KYIV's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
ATEX
Anterix Inc.
Telecom Services · Quality-Growth
51.4
$84.53 · $1.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
20.6
KYIV leads
KYIV
Kyivstar Group Ltd.
Telecom Services · Quality-Growth
72
$12.10 · $2.8B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestKYIV17.3x
Fastest growthKYIV+25.9%
Strongest balance sheetATEX0.01
Highest qualityATEX77 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueKYIV-56%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ATEX
stronger →← stronger
KYIV
77
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
67
63
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
87
28
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
73
KYIV is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ATEX
KYIV
$11mC-
FCF
$311mC
+7.8%B
Rev
+25.9%A-
0.01A
D/E
0.39B+
24.2xB
P/E
17.3xB
—
PEG
1.21B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ATEX
KYIV
511% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
56% below
>60%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~-8%/yr
-87%
1-yr DCF upside
+88%
-84%
5-yr DCF upside
+125%
-76%
10-yr DCF upside
+192%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ATEX
Why this score
Diluting shareholders
KYIV
Why this score
Diluting shareholders
Short track record
The companies
ATEXAnterix Inc.
Telecom Services · $84.53 · beta 0.89
Why now
Telecom Services · market cap $1.7b. Down 25% from 52-week high of $113.00 — deep drawdown territory. 3 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $112.33 (implying +33% upside).
Moat
ROE 23% is above 15% — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
KYIVKyivstar Group Ltd.
Telecom Services · $12.10
Why now
Telecom Services · market cap $2.8b. Down 27% from 52-week high of $16.55 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +26% — in hypergrowth territory. 9 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $17.93 (implying +48% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
KYIV leads ATEX by 6.8 points (68.2 to 61.4), its sharpest advantage coming in Rev (grade A-). A contrarian could still prefer ATEX for its stronger PEG (grade A). Note they play different roles — ATEX screens as value, KYIV screens as growth — so the model rewards different traits for each.
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ATEX and KYIV diverge
On the headline score the gap is 20.6 points in favor of KYIV. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
ValueATEX 27.9 · KYIV 73.5KYIV +45.6
GrowthATEX 63.2 · KYIV 87.1KYIV +23.9
QualityATEX 77.1 · KYIV 67.1ATEX +10.0
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is KYIV or ATEX the better stock?
KYIV scores higher: KYIV 72.0, ATEX 51.4 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do KYIV and ATEX differ most?
The widest gap is value, where KYIV leads by 46 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.
How are KYIV and ATEX scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.