COMPARE · Reviewed August 4, 2026
ASO vs LULU
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ASO scored 67.0, LULU scored 70.0 — LULU leads.
Compare another set
ASO
Academy Sports and Outdoors, Inc.
67
$48.71 · $3.0B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
3.0
LULU leads
LULU
lululemon athletica inc.
70
$123.03 · $14.0B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ASO
stronger →← stronger
LULU
73
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
88
56
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
46
74
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
84
LULU is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ASO
LULU
$237mC
FCF
$1.3bC+
+3.8%C+
Rev
+4.2%C+
0.92B
D/E
0.44B+
8.6xA
P/E
10.0xA
0.60A-
PEG
0.91B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ASO
LULU
21% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
33% below
~0%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-7%/yr
+18%
1-yr DCF upside
+51%
+27%
5-yr DCF upside
+50%
+39%
10-yr DCF upside
+49%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ASO
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
LULU
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
The companies
ASOAcademy Sports and Outdoors, Inc.
Why now
Specialty Retail · market cap $3.0b. Down 22% from 52-week high of $62.45 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.60 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 19 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $60.05 (implying +23% upside).
Moat
ROE 18% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
LULUlululemon athletica inc.
Why now
Apparel Retail · market cap $14.0b. Down 46% from 52-week high of $225.98 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.91 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 26 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $127.73 (implying +4% upside).
Moat
Net margin 13% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 30% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Down 46% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.