COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
ARXS vs LMT
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ARXS scored 49.3, LMT scored 67.8 — LMT leads.
Compare another set
ARXS
Arxis, Inc.
49.3
$53.26 · $22.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
18.5
LMT leads
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
67.8
$563.57 · $130.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthARXS+115.5%
- Strongest balance sheetARXS0.40
- Highest qualityLMT80 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueLMT-8%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ARXS
stronger →← stronger
LMT
68
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
80
100
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
67
18
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
58
LMT is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ARXS
LMT
$199mC
FCF
$8.7bB+
+115.5%A
Rev
+7.2%B
0.40B+
D/E
2.34D
13.0xD
P/S
—
—
PEG
1.22B
—
P/E
20.8xB+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ARXS
LMT
390% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
8% below
~58%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~3%/yr
-84%
1-yr DCF upside
+3%
-80%
5-yr DCF upside
+9%
-70%
10-yr DCF upside
+18%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ARXS
Why this score
- Short track record
LMT
Why this score
- Durable high returns
The companies
ARXSArxis, Inc.
Why now
Aerospace & Defense · market cap $22.9b. 13% off the 52-week high of $61.50. Revenue growing +115% — in hypergrowth territory. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $61.70 (implying +16% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 156% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
P/S 13.0x embeds aggressive forward growth — disappointing top-line guidance would compress the multiple hard.
LMTLockheed Martin Corporation
Why now
Aerospace & Defense · market cap $130.1b. 19% off the 52-week high of $692.00. 19 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $632.95 (implying +12% upside).
Moat
ROE 72% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 139% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined. $130.1b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
D/E 2.34 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ARXS and LMT diverge
On the headline score the gap is 18.5 points in favor of LMT. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueARXS 17.5 · LMT 57.7LMT +40.2
- GrowthARXS 100.0 · LMT 67.1ARXS +32.9
- QualityARXS 68.1 · LMT 80.4LMT +12.3
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.