Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ARXS scored 72.0, BWXT scored 58.2 — ARXS leads.
Compare another set
ARXS
Arxis, Inc.
Aerospace & Defense · Quality-Growth
72
$47.89 · $20.6B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
13.8
ARXS leads
BWXT
BWX Technologies, Inc.
Aerospace & Defense · Quality-Growth
58.2
$143.83 · $13.2B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
Fastest growthARXS+115.5%
Strongest balance sheetARXS0.40
Highest qualityARXS77 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ARXS
stronger →← stronger
BWXT
77
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
65
98
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
83
62
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
37
ARXS is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ARXS
BWXT
$314mC
FCF
$317mC
+115.5%A
Rev
+18.3%B+
0.40B+
D/E
1.51C
11.7xD
P/S
—
—
PEG
1.67C+
—
P/E
37.3xC
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ARXS
BWXT
183% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
93% above
~43%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~24%/yr
-73%
1-yr DCF upside
-52%
-65%
5-yr DCF upside
-48%
-48%
10-yr DCF upside
-41%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ARXS
Why this score
Short track record
BWXT
Why this score
Raising its dividend
The companies
ARXSArxis, Inc.
Aerospace & Defense · $47.89
Why now
Aerospace & Defense · market cap $20.6b. Down 22% from 52-week high of $61.50 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +115% — in hypergrowth territory. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $63.30 (implying +32% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income, mostly because of depreciation and amortization ($206m) — non-cash charges that hold down reported earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
P/S 11.7x embeds aggressive forward growth — disappointing top-line guidance would compress the multiple hard.
BWXTBWX Technologies, Inc.
Aerospace & Defense · $143.83 · beta 0.74
Why now
Aerospace & Defense · market cap $13.2b. Down 41% from 52-week high of $241.82 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +18%, comfortably above the S&P median. 16 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $215.51 (implying +50% upside).
Moat
ROE 28% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Down 41% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Trailing P/E 37x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ARXS and BWXT diverge
On the headline score the gap is 13.8 points in favor of ARXS. The widest single difference is Value, where ARXS leads by 26.0 points.
ValueARXS 62.5 · BWXT 36.5ARXS +26.0
GrowthARXS 98.0 · BWXT 83.2ARXS +14.8
QualityARXS 76.8 · BWXT 65.0ARXS +11.8
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is ARXS or BWXT the better stock?
ARXS scores higher: ARXS 72.0, BWXT 58.2 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do ARXS and BWXT differ most?
The widest gap is value, where ARXS leads by 26 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. ARXS leads all three pillars, so the gap is broad rather than a single-measure difference.
How are ARXS and BWXT scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.