COMPARE · Reviewed August 3, 2026
ARW vs SNX
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ARW scored 59.2, SNX scored 60.8 — SNX leads.
Compare another set
ARW
Arrow Electronics, Inc.
59.2
$216.81 · $11.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
1.6
SNX leads
SNX
TD SYNNEX Corporation
60.8
$253.82 · $20.3B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ARW
stronger →← stronger
SNX
53
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
62
81
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
94
48
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
39
SNX is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ARW
SNX
$304mC
FCF
$375mC
+20.5%A-
Rev
+16.3%B+
0.36B
D/E
0.53B
15.5xA-
P/E
18.2xA-
0.95B+
PEG
1.15B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ARW
SNX
161% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
299% above
~31%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~47%/yr
-64%
1-yr DCF upside
-78%
-62%
5-yr DCF upside
-75%
-59%
10-yr DCF upside
-70%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ARW
No notable signals flagged.
SNX
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
The companies
ARWArrow Electronics, Inc.
Why now
Electronics & Computer Distribution · market cap $11.1b. 9% off the 52-week high of $237.33. Revenue growing +20%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.95 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 4 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $222.00 (implying +2% upside).
Moat
ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Net margin 2.2% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
SNXTD SYNNEX Corporation
Why now
Electronics & Computer Distribution · market cap $20.3b. 14% off the 52-week high of $296.47. Revenue growing +16%, comfortably above the S&P median. 11 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $333.55 (implying +31% upside).
Moat
ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Beta 1.44 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Net margin 1.6% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.