COMPARE · Data as of August 27, 2026
ARQT vs AUPH
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ARQT scored 66.1, AUPH scored 72.8 — AUPH leads.
Compare another set
ARQT
Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
66.1
$24.87 · $3.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
6.7
AUPH leads
AUPH
Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.
72.8
$16.75 · $2.2B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestAUPH7.3x
- Fastest growthARQT+76.1%
- Strongest balance sheetAUPH0.10
- Highest qualityAUPH74 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueAUPH-8%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ARQT
stronger →← stronger
AUPH
47
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
74
100
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
60
62
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
87
AUPH is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ARQT
AUPH
$39mC-
FCF
$175mC
+76.1%A
Rev
+20.4%A-
0.52B
D/E
0.10B+
113.0xD
P/E
7.3xA
0.52A-
PEG
0.57A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ARQT
AUPH
386% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
8% below
>60%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~6%/yr
-84%
1-yr DCF upside
-4%
-79%
5-yr DCF upside
+9%
-70%
10-yr DCF upside
+29%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ARQT
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
AUPH
Why this score
- Earnings outpace cash
The companies
ARQTArcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
Why now
Biotechnology · market cap $3.1b. Down 22% from 52-week high of $31.77 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +76% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.52 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $36.88 (implying +48% upside).
Moat
ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 137% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined. Pharma moat is patent runway + pipeline depth — a single approved molecule funds the next generation of bets. Late-stage trials carry binary readouts that swing valuation 30%+.
Risk
Trailing P/E 113.0x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Beta 1.53 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Trial-readout binary — late-stage clinical trials carry approve/reject outcomes that swing valuation 30%+; the equity is effectively a portfolio of these binary events, not a steady cash-flow business.
AUPHAurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Why now
Biotechnology · market cap $2.2b. 13% off the 52-week high of $19.25. Revenue growing +20%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.57 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $17.86 (implying +7% upside).
Moat
ROE 51% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. Pharma moat is patent runway + pipeline depth — a single approved molecule funds the next generation of bets. Late-stage trials carry binary readouts that swing valuation 30%+.
Risk
Beta 1.40 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Trial-readout binary — late-stage clinical trials carry approve/reject outcomes that swing valuation 30%+; the equity is effectively a portfolio of these binary events, not a steady cash-flow business.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ARQT and AUPH diverge
On the headline score the gap is 6.7 points in favor of AUPH. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthARQT 99.7 · AUPH 60.3ARQT +39.4
- QualityARQT 46.8 · AUPH 74.0AUPH +27.2
- ValueARQT 61.9 · AUPH 86.6AUPH +24.7
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.