COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
AR vs RRC
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. AR scored 63.9, RRC scored 66.3 — RRC leads.
Compare another set
AR
Antero Resources Corporation
63.9
$37.94 · $11.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
2.4
RRC leads
RRC
Range Resources Corporation
66.3
$41.06 · $9.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestAR10.9x
- Fastest growthAR+25.8%
- Strongest balance sheetRRC0.22
- Highest qualityRRC89 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueRRC-44%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
AR
stronger →← stronger
RRC
66
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
89
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
79
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
65
AR and RRC split the three pillars evenly.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
AR
RRC
$899mC+
FCF
$1.4bC+
+25.8%A-
Rev
+17.3%B+
0.55B
D/E
0.22A-
10.9xB+
P/E
11.3xB+
0.49A
PEG
1.03B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
AR
RRC
7% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
44% below
~0%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-14%/yr
+11%
1-yr DCF upside
+95%
+7%
5-yr DCF upside
+79%
+3%
10-yr DCF upside
+59%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
AR
Why this score
- Cyclical growth
RRC
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Cyclical growth
The companies
ARAntero Resources Corporation
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $11.7b. 17% off the 52-week high of $45.75. Revenue growing +26% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.49 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 20 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $49.40 (implying +30% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Jurisdictional + permitting risk — mining and extraction operations concentrate exposure to political stability, royalty regimes, and environmental review timelines that can stall production for years.
RRCRange Resources Corporation
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $9.6b. 15% off the 52-week high of $48.31. Revenue growing +17%, comfortably above the S&P median. 22 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $45.64 (implying +11% upside).
Moat
Net margin 26% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 18% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 158% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Hedge-book exposure — many commodity producers hedge forward production; if the hedge book is concentrated at prices well below spot, the upside the market expects is already locked away.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
RRC leads AR by 0.1 points (63.9 to 63.8), its sharpest advantage coming in D/E (grade A-). A contrarian could still prefer AR, which trades about 22% below our DCF fair value — a margin of safety the score doesn't reward. Note they play different roles — AR screens as value, RRC screens as growth — so the model rewards different traits for each.
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where AR and RRC diverge
On the headline score the gap is 2.4 points in favor of RRC. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityAR 66.3 · RRC 89.0RRC +22.7
- ValueAR 78.6 · RRC 65.3AR +13.3
- GrowthAR 50.0 · RRC 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.