Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. AR scored 61.8, FANG scored 47.2 — AR leads.
Compare another set
AR
Antero Resources Corporation
Oil & Gas E&P · Quality-Growth
61.8
$35.90 · $11.0B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
14.6
AR leads
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
Oil & Gas E&P · Quality-Growth
47.2
$192.13 · $53.8B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestAR10.3x
Fastest growthFANG+21.4%
Strongest balance sheetFANG0.29
Highest qualityAR66 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueFANG-57%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
AR
stronger →← stronger
FANG
66
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
60
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
72
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
35
AR is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
AR
FANG
$899mC+
FCF
$3.7bB
+18.7%B+
Rev
+21.4%A-
0.55B
D/E
0.29A-
10.3xA-
P/E
36.6xC
0.42A
PEG
21.24D
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
AR
FANG
52% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
57% below
~-10%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~-7%/yr
+97%
1-yr DCF upside
+87%
+110%
5-yr DCF upside
+135%
+132%
10-yr DCF upside
+233%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
AR
Why this score
Cyclical growth
FANG
Why this score
Buying back stock
Raising its dividend
Cyclical growth
The companies
ARAntero Resources Corporation
Oil & Gas E&P · $35.90 · beta 0.54
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $11.0b. Down 22% from 52-week high of $45.75 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +19%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.42 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 21 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $49.14 (implying +37% upside).
Moat
Net margin 19% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Jurisdictional + permitting risk — mining and extraction operations concentrate exposure to political stability, royalty regimes, and environmental review timelines that can stall production for years.
FANGDiamondback Energy, Inc.
Oil & Gas E&P · $192.13 · beta 0.54
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $53.8b. 11% off the 52-week high of $216.90. Revenue growing +21%, comfortably above the S&P median. 29 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $234.66 (implying +22% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income, mostly because of depreciation and amortization ($5.2b) — non-cash charges that hold down reported earnings while cash generation stays strong. $53.8b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Trailing P/E 37x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. ROE 4% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate. Production-cost sensitivity — top-quartile cost producers generate cash through the cycle while marginal producers burn it; watch the cost-per-unit trend, not just headline revenue.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where AR and FANG diverge
On the headline score the gap is 14.6 points in favor of AR. The widest single difference is Value, where AR leads by 36.7 points.
ValueAR 71.9 · FANG 35.2AR +36.7
QualityAR 65.6 · FANG 59.6AR +6.0
GrowthAR 50.0 · FANG 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is AR or FANG the better stock?
AR scores higher: AR 61.8, FANG 47.2 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do AR and FANG differ most?
The widest gap is value, where AR leads by 37 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. AR also leads quality, while growth is effectively level between them.
How are AR and FANG scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.