COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
AQN vs CIG
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. AQN scored 50.6, CIG scored 83.0 — CIG leads.
Compare another set
AQN
Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp.
50.6
$5.70 · $4.4B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
32.4
CIG leads
CIG
Comp En De Mn Cemig
83
$1.92
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthCIG+8.1%
- Strongest balance sheetCIG0.78
- Highest qualityAQN33 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Fundamentals, head-to-head
AQN
CIG
-$178mF
FCF
$354mC
+4.9%C+
Rev
+8.1%B
1.34B
D/E
0.78A
1.8xB+
P/S
—
1.72C+
PEG
0.33A
—
P/E
6.2xA
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Model signals
AQN
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
- Cut its dividend
CIG
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
AQNAlgonquin Power & Utilities Corp.
Why now
Utilities - Diversified · market cap $4.4b. 20% off the 52-week high of $7.11. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $6.75 (implying +18% upside).
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$178m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Dividend payout 108% of earnings on a 4.5% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. ROE 4% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
CIGComp En De Mn Cemig
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Electric · market cap n/a. Down 30% from 52-week high of $2.76 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.33 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 3 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $2.14 (implying +11% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 26% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Down 30% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Dividend payout 80% of earnings on a 9.2% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.