Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. APO scored 78.0, HLNE scored 81.0 — HLNE leads.
Compare another set
APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
Asset Management · Financial strength
44.1Fin
$118.65 · $70.1B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
42.0
HLNE leads
HLNE
Hamilton Lane Incorporated
Asset Management · Financial strength
86.1Fin
$85.67 · $5.7B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestHLNE13.1x
Fastest growthAPO+22.7%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
APO
HLNE
+22.7%A-
Rev
+6.5%C+
42.5xD
P/E
13.1xB
11.4%B
ROE
32.4%A
3.49C
P/B
3.91C
1.9%C+
Yield
2.8%B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
The companies
APOApollo Global Management, Inc.
Asset Management · $118.65 · beta 1.58
Why now
Asset Management · market cap $70.1b. Down 23% from 52-week high of $153.29 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +23%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.43 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 20 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $151.45 (implying +28% upside).
Moat
ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. $70.1b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Beta 1.58 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Trailing P/E 43x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. Balance-sheet financial — book value, net interest margin, and credit loss provisions are the lever points; a rates regime change or a deterioration in the loan book moves the stock more than EPS does.
HLNEHamilton Lane Incorporated
Asset Management · $85.67 · beta 1.25
Why now
Asset Management · market cap $5.7b. Down 45% from 52-week high of $155.66 — deep drawdown territory. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $129.38 (implying +51% upside).
Moat
Net margin 32% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 32% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Down 45% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Balance-sheet financial — book value, net interest margin, and credit loss provisions are the lever points; a rates regime change or a deterioration in the loan book moves the stock more than EPS does.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Common questions
Is HLNE or APO the better stock?
HLNE scores higher: HLNE 81.0, APO 78.0 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
How are HLNE and APO scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.