COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
ANIP vs SNY
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ANIP scored 80.0, SNY scored 43.0 — ANIP leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. ANIP's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but SNY's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
ANIP
ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
80
$74.17 · $1.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
37.0
ANIP leads
SNY
Sanofi
43
$45.69 · $109.5B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestANIP16.2x
- Fastest growthANIP+30.9%
- Strongest balance sheetSNY0.34
- Highest qualitySNY69 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueANIP-47%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ANIP
stronger →← stronger
SNY
66
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
69
94
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
51
82
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
26
ANIP is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ANIP
SNY
$173mC
FCF
$9.8bB+
+30.9%A
Rev
+6.2%C+
1.05C
D/E
0.34B
16.2xA-
P/E
24.3xB+
1.21B
PEG
29.79D
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ANIP
SNY
47% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
32% below
~-7%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-4%/yr
+64%
1-yr DCF upside
+38%
+88%
5-yr DCF upside
+48%
+127%
10-yr DCF upside
+62%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ANIP
No notable signals flagged.
SNY
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Foreign reporter (EUR)
The companies
ANIPANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Why now
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic · market cap $1.7b. Down 25% from 52-week high of $99.50 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +31% — in hypergrowth territory. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $108.38 (implying +46% upside).
Moat
ROE 18% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 160% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined. Pharma moat is patent runway + pipeline depth — a single approved molecule funds the next generation of bets. Late-stage trials carry binary readouts that swing valuation 30%+.
Risk
Trial-readout binary — late-stage clinical trials carry approve/reject outcomes that swing valuation 30%+; the equity is effectively a portfolio of these binary events, not a steady cash-flow business.
SNYSanofi
Why now
Drug Manufacturers - General · market cap $109.5b. 13% off the 52-week high of $52.68. 9 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $53.72 (implying +18% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Dividend payout 128% of earnings on a 5.3% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. Trial-readout binary — late-stage clinical trials carry approve/reject outcomes that swing valuation 30%+; the equity is effectively a portfolio of these binary events, not a steady cash-flow business.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ANIP and SNY diverge
On the headline score the gap is 37.0 points in favor of ANIP. The widest single difference is Value, where ANIP leads by 56.2 points.
- ValueANIP 82.5 · SNY 26.3ANIP +56.2
- GrowthANIP 93.8 · SNY 51.1ANIP +42.7
- QualityANIP 66.2 · SNY 69.1level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.