COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026

ANIP vs PAHC

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ANIP scored 79.6, PAHC scored 72.1 — ANIP leads.
Compare another set
ANIP
ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic · Quality-Growth
79.6
$75.35 · $1.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
7.5
ANIP leads
PAHC
Phibro Animal Health Corp
Pharmaceuticals · Quality-Growth
72.1
$36.32 · $1.5B
  • CheapestANIP16.4x
  • Fastest growthANIP+30.9%
  • Strongest balance sheetANIP1.05
  • Highest qualityANIP66 / 100
  • Largest discount to fair valueANIP-46%
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD79.6/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY66.2GROWTH93.8VALUE81.2
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD72.1/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY61.3GROWTH85.6VALUE71.4
ANIPPAHCQuality66.261.3Growth93.885.6Value81.271.4
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)16%41%9.5x21xANIPPAHC

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

FCFANIP$173mPAHC$13m
RevANIP+30.9%PAHC+26.0%
D/EANIP1.05PAHC2.52
P/EANIP16.4xPAHC14.5x
ANIP
stronger →← stronger
PAHC
66
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
61
94
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
86
81
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
71
ANIP is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
ANIP
PAHC
$173mC
FCF
$13mC-
+30.9%A
Rev
+26.0%A-
1.05C
D/E
2.52D+
16.4xA-
P/E
14.5xB+
1.26B
PEG
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
ANIP
PAHC
46% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
391% above
~-6%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~59%/yr
+62%
1-yr DCF upside
-85%
+85%
5-yr DCF upside
-80%
+123%
10-yr DCF upside
-70%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
ANIPANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic · $75.35 · beta 0.46
Why now
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic · market cap $1.7b. Down 24% from 52-week high of $99.50 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +31% — in hypergrowth territory. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $108.38 (implying +44% upside).
Moat
ROE 18% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 160% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined. Pharma moat is patent runway + pipeline depth — a single approved molecule funds the next generation of bets. Late-stage trials carry binary readouts that swing valuation 30%+.
Risk
Trial-readout binary — late-stage clinical trials carry approve/reject outcomes that swing valuation 30%+; the equity is effectively a portfolio of these binary events, not a steady cash-flow business.
PAHCPhibro Animal Health Corp
Pharmaceuticals · $36.32 · beta 0.42
Why now
Pharmaceuticals · market cap $1.5b. Down 40% from 52-week high of $60.08 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +26% — in hypergrowth territory.
Moat
ROE 29% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. Pharma moat is patent runway + pipeline depth — a single approved molecule funds the next generation of bets. Late-stage trials carry binary readouts that swing valuation 30%+.
Risk
D/E 2.52 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Down 40% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Trial-readout binary — late-stage clinical trials carry approve/reject outcomes that swing valuation 30%+; the equity is effectively a portfolio of these binary events, not a steady cash-flow business.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where ANIP and PAHC diverge

On the headline score the gap is 7.5 points in favor of ANIP. The widest single difference is Value, where ANIP leads by 9.8 points.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.