COMPARE · Reviewed July 29, 2026
ANDG vs ROL
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ANDG scored 53.9, ROL scored 68.0 — ROL leads.
Compare another set
ANDG
Andersen Group Inc.
53.9
$45.52 · $5.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
14.1
ROL leads
ROL
Rollins, Inc.
68
$37.80 · $18.2B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ANDG
stronger →← stronger
ROL
59
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
85
87
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
81
31
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
45
ROL is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ANDG
ROL
$174mC
FCF
$619mC+
+14.6%B+
Rev
+9.9%B
—
D/E
0.78B+
6.1xD
P/S
—
—
PEG
2.89C
—
P/E
34.4xC+
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ANDG
ROL
27% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
30% above
~20%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~14%/yr
-40%
1-yr DCF upside
-32%
-21%
5-yr DCF upside
-23%
+17%
10-yr DCF upside
-9%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ANDG
Why this score
- Short track record
ROL
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
The companies
ANDGAndersen Group Inc.
Why now
Personal Services · market cap $5.1b. 6% off the 52-week high of $48.32. Revenue growing +15%, comfortably above the S&P median. 6 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $40.50 (implying -11% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
Currently unprofitable (margin -0.3%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. ROE 0% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
ROLRollins, Inc.
Why now
Personal Services · market cap $18.2b. Down 43% from 52-week high of $66.14 — deep drawdown territory. 17 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $45.59 (implying +21% upside).
Moat
Net margin 14% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 37% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 116% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 43% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Trailing P/E 34x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.