COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
ANDE vs POST
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ANDE scored 64.9, POST scored 65.8 — POST leads.
Compare another set
ANDE
The Andersons, Inc.
64.9
$68.06 · $2.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
0.9
POST leads
POST
Post Holdings, Inc.
65.8
$80.50 · $3.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestANDE13.2x
- Fastest growthPOST+6.2%
- Strongest balance sheetANDE0.66
- Highest qualityANDE64 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valuePOST-46%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ANDE
stronger →← stronger
POST
64
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
52
65
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
72
66
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
76
POST is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ANDE
POST
$57mC-
FCF
$553mC+
+5.7%C+
Rev
+6.2%C+
0.66B+
D/E
2.47D
13.2xA-
P/E
14.6xA-
0.89B+
PEG
1.17B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ANDE
POST
103% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
46% below
~20%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-16%/yr
-50%
1-yr DCF upside
+106%
-51%
5-yr DCF upside
+85%
-51%
10-yr DCF upside
+60%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ANDE
POST
Why this score
- Buying back stock
The companies
ANDEThe Andersons, Inc.
Why now
Food Distribution · market cap $2.3b. 17% off the 52-week high of $82.11. PEG 0.89 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 3 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $88.33 (implying +30% upside).
Moat
ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
POSTPost Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Packaged Foods · market cap $3.6b. Down 31% from 52-week high of $117.28 — deep drawdown territory. 6 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $105.17 (implying +31% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 189% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
D/E 2.47 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Down 31% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Net margin 3.5% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ANDE and POST diverge
On the headline score the gap is 0.9 points in favor of POST. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityANDE 64.2 · POST 52.5ANDE +11.7
- ValueANDE 65.9 · POST 75.6POST +9.7
- GrowthANDE 64.7 · POST 71.7POST +7.0
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.