COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
ANDE vs COCO
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ANDE scored 64.9, COCO scored 65.3 — COCO leads.
Compare another set
ANDE
The Andersons, Inc.
64.9
$68.06 · $2.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
0.4
COCO leads
COCO
The Vita Coco Company, Inc.
65.3
$63.35 · $3.7B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestANDE13.2x
- Fastest growthCOCO+26.1%
- Strongest balance sheetCOCO0.04
- Highest qualityCOCO85 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ANDE
stronger →← stronger
COCO
64
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
85
65
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
93
66
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
35
COCO is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ANDE
COCO
$57mC-
FCF
$124mC
+5.7%C+
Rev
+26.1%A-
0.66B+
D/E
0.04A
13.2xA-
P/E
35.0xC
0.89B+
PEG
2.36C
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ANDE
COCO
103% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
25% above
~20%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~15%/yr
-50%
1-yr DCF upside
-32%
-51%
5-yr DCF upside
-20%
-51%
10-yr DCF upside
+1%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ANDE
COCO
Why this score
- Durable high returns
The companies
ANDEThe Andersons, Inc.
Why now
Food Distribution · market cap $2.3b. 17% off the 52-week high of $82.11. PEG 0.89 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 3 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $88.33 (implying +30% upside).
Moat
ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
COCOThe Vita Coco Company, Inc.
Why now
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic · market cap $3.7b. Down 26% from 52-week high of $85.83 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +26% — in hypergrowth territory. 9 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $83.89 (implying +32% upside).
Moat
Net margin 16% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 28% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 112% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 35x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ANDE and COCO diverge
The two are effectively level on the headline score. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueANDE 65.9 · COCO 35.4ANDE +30.5
- GrowthANDE 64.7 · COCO 93.0COCO +28.3
- QualityANDE 64.2 · COCO 84.7COCO +20.5
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.