COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
ANDE vs BRBR
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ANDE scored 64.9, BRBR scored 72.0 — BRBR leads.
Compare another set
ANDE
The Andersons, Inc.
64.9
$68.06 · $2.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
7.1
BRBR leads
BRBR
BellRing Brands, Inc.
72
$10.19 · $1.2B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestBRBR7.2x
- Fastest growthBRBR+16.1%
- Highest qualityANDE64 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueBRBR-86%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ANDE
stronger →← stronger
BRBR
64
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
62
65
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
62
66
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
98
ANDE is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ANDE
BRBR
$57mC-
FCF
$225mC
+5.7%C+
Rev
+16.1%B+
0.66B+
D/E
—
13.2xA-
P/E
7.2xA
0.89B+
PEG
0.28A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ANDE
BRBR
103% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
86% below
~20%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
decline
-50%
1-yr DCF upside
+446%
-51%
5-yr DCF upside
+626%
-51%
10-yr DCF upside
+1023%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ANDE
BRBR
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Short track record
The companies
ANDEThe Andersons, Inc.
Why now
Food Distribution · market cap $2.3b. 17% off the 52-week high of $82.11. PEG 0.89 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 3 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $88.33 (implying +30% upside).
Moat
ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
BRBRBellRing Brands, Inc.
Why now
Packaged Foods · market cap $1.2b. Down 76% from 52-week high of $43.02 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +16%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.28 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $14.71 (implying +44% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 131% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 76% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. ROE -37% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ANDE and BRBR diverge
On the headline score the gap is 7.1 points in favor of BRBR. The widest single difference is Value, where BRBR leads by 32.5 points.
- ValueANDE 65.9 · BRBR 98.4BRBR +32.5
- GrowthANDE 64.7 · BRBR 62.1level
- QualityANDE 64.2 · BRBR 62.1level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.