COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
AMTM vs VRSK
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. AMTM scored 53.0, VRSK scored 69.0 — VRSK leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. AMTM's fundamentals are as of July 2026, but VRSK's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
AMTM
Amentum Holdings, Inc.
53
$20.14 · $4.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
16.0
VRSK leads
VRSK
Verisk Analytics, Inc.
69
$190.15 · $24.7B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestAMTM24.3x
- Fastest growthAMTM+11.4%
- Highest qualityVRSK82 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueAMTM-36%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
AMTM
stronger →← stronger
VRSK
45
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
82
78
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
71
43
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
57
VRSK is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
AMTM
VRSK
$474mC
FCF
$1.1bC+
+11.4%B
Rev
+5.9%C+
0.80B
D/E
—
24.3xB+
P/E
29.2xB
3.44D
PEG
1.77C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
AMTM
VRSK
36% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
12% below
~-5%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~5%/yr
+47%
1-yr DCF upside
0%
+56%
5-yr DCF upside
+13%
+68%
10-yr DCF upside
+37%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
AMTM
Why this score
- Short track record
VRSK
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
The companies
AMTMAmentum Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Specialty Business Services · market cap $4.9b. Down 47% from 52-week high of $38.11 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $29.58 (implying +47% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Down 47% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Net margin 1.4% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE 4% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
VRSKVerisk Analytics, Inc.
Why now
Consulting Services · market cap $24.7b. Down 31% from 52-week high of $273.83 — deep drawdown territory. 17 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $237.71 (implying +25% upside).
Moat
Net margin 29% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. FCF converts 124% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 31% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. ROE -78% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where AMTM and VRSK diverge
On the headline score the gap is 16.0 points in favor of VRSK. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityAMTM 44.6 · VRSK 82.1VRSK +37.5
- ValueAMTM 42.8 · VRSK 56.6VRSK +13.8
- GrowthAMTM 77.7 · VRSK 70.6AMTM +7.1
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.