COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
AMTM vs HURN
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. AMTM scored 53.0, HURN scored 70.8 — HURN leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. AMTM's fundamentals are as of July 2026, but HURN's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
AMTM
Amentum Holdings, Inc.
53
$20.14 · $4.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
17.8
HURN leads
HURN
Huron Consulting Group Inc.
70.8
$161.64 · $2.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestAMTM24.3x
- Fastest growthHURN+11.8%
- Strongest balance sheetAMTM0.80
- Highest qualityHURN67 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueAMTM-36%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
AMTM
stronger →← stronger
HURN
45
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
67
78
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
87
43
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
61
HURN is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
AMTM
HURN
$474mC
FCF
$124mC
+11.4%B
Rev
+11.8%B
0.80B
D/E
2.25D
24.3xB+
P/E
24.4xB+
3.44D
PEG
1.47B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
AMTM
HURN
36% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
8% above
~-5%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~12%/yr
+47%
1-yr DCF upside
-21%
+56%
5-yr DCF upside
-8%
+68%
10-yr DCF upside
+15%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
AMTM
Why this score
- Short track record
HURN
Why this score
- Buying back stock
The companies
AMTMAmentum Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Specialty Business Services · market cap $4.9b. Down 47% from 52-week high of $38.11 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $29.58 (implying +47% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Down 47% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Net margin 1.4% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE 4% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
HURNHuron Consulting Group Inc.
Why now
Consulting Services · market cap $2.6b. 13% off the 52-week high of $186.78. Revenue growing +12%, comfortably above the S&P median. 4 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $190.75 (implying +18% upside).
Moat
ROE 26% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 119% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
D/E 2.25 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where AMTM and HURN diverge
On the headline score the gap is 17.8 points in favor of HURN. The widest single difference is Quality, where HURN leads by 22.8 points.
- QualityAMTM 44.6 · HURN 67.4HURN +22.8
- ValueAMTM 42.8 · HURN 60.7HURN +17.9
- GrowthAMTM 77.7 · HURN 86.6HURN +8.9
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.