COMPARE · Reviewed July 29, 2026
AMRZ vs EXP
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. AMRZ scored 52.8, EXP scored 58.0 — EXP leads.
Compare another set
AMRZ
Amrize Ltd
52.8
$49.68 · $27.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
5.2
EXP leads
EXP
Eagle Materials Inc.
58
$204.26 · $6.3B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
AMRZ
stronger →← stronger
EXP
57
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
76
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
52
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
52
AMRZ and EXP split the three pillars evenly.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
AMRZ
EXP
$1.3bC+
FCF
$171mC
+2.5%C
Rev
+1.7%C
0.54C+
D/E
1.22C
23.8xC+
P/E
15.5xB+
1.37B
PEG
2.09C
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
AMRZ
EXP
12% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
167% above
~12%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~35%/yr
-22%
1-yr DCF upside
-67%
-11%
5-yr DCF upside
-62%
+9%
10-yr DCF upside
-56%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
AMRZ
Why this score
- Cyclical growth
- Short track record
EXP
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
- Cyclical growth
The companies
AMRZAmrize Ltd
Why now
Building Materials · market cap $27.5b. Down 25% from 52-week high of $65.94 — deep drawdown territory. 19 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $63.00 (implying +27% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 114% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined. Mining moat is reserve quality + extraction cost per unit — top-quartile cost producers generate cash through the commodity cycle while marginal producers burn it.
Risk
Hedge-book exposure — many commodity producers hedge forward production; if the hedge book is concentrated at prices well below spot, the upside the market expects is already locked away.
EXPEagle Materials Inc.
Why now
Building Materials · market cap $6.3b. 17% off the 52-week high of $245.53. 9 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $226.22 (implying +11% upside).
Moat
Net margin 17% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 27% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. Mining moat is reserve quality + extraction cost per unit — top-quartile cost producers generate cash through the commodity cycle while marginal producers burn it.
Risk
Production-cost sensitivity — top-quartile cost producers generate cash through the cycle while marginal producers burn it; watch the cost-per-unit trend, not just headline revenue.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.