COMPARE · Data as of August 28, 2026
AMP vs APAM
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. AMP scored 78.0, APAM scored 79.0 — APAM leads.
Compare another set
AMP
Ameriprise Financial, Inc.
80.3Fin
$559.32 · $49.4B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
13.5
APAM leads
APAM
Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc.
93.8Fin
$43.55 · $3.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestAPAM10.4x
- Fastest growthAPAM+7.6%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
AMP
APAM
+7.0%B
Rev
+7.6%B
13.4xB
P/E
10.4xA-
63.4%A
ROE
64.6%A
7.77D
P/B
7.36D
1.2%C+
Yield
8.0%A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
The companies
AMPAmeriprise Financial, Inc.
Why now
Asset Management · market cap $49.4b. Trading near 52-week high of $572.56 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $579.45 (implying +4% upside).
Moat
Net margin 20% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 63% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Trading within 2% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction. Balance-sheet financial — book value, net interest margin, and credit loss provisions are the lever points; a rates regime change or a deterioration in the loan book moves the stock more than EPS does.
APAMArtisan Partners Asset Management Inc.
Why now
Asset Management · market cap $3.1b. 8% off the 52-week high of $47.57. 4 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $39.25 (implying -10% upside).
Moat
Net margin 24% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 65% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Beta 1.65 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Dividend payout 81% of earnings on a 8.0% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. Balance-sheet financial — book value, net interest margin, and credit loss provisions are the lever points; a rates regime change or a deterioration in the loan book moves the stock more than EPS does.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.