COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026

AMKR vs SKHY

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. AMKR scored 58.0, SKHY scored 72.0 — SKHY leads.
Compare another set
AMKR
Amkor Technology, Inc.
Semiconductor Equipment & Materials · Quality-Growth
58
$50.26 · $12.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
14.0
SKHY leads
SKHY
SK hynix Inc.
Semiconductors · Quality-Growth
72
$163.41 · $1.2T
fundamentals as of
  • CheapestSKHY10.0x
  • Fastest growthSKHY+46.8%
  • Strongest balance sheetSKHY0.07
  • Highest qualitySKHY92 / 100
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD58.0/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY50.0GROWTH78.7VALUE49.7
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD72.0/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY91.8GROWTH97.5VALUE79.4
AMKRSKHYQuality50.091.8Growth78.797.5Value49.779.4
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)3%57%5.0x28xAMKRSKHY

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

FCFAMKR$167mSKHY$29.3b
RevAMKR+12.7%SKHY+46.8%
D/EAMKR0.57SKHY0.07
P/EAMKR22.5xSKHY10.0x
PEGAMKR0.76SKHY0.31
AMKR
stronger →← stronger
SKHY
50
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
92
79
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
98
50
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
79
SKHY is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
AMKR
SKHY
$167mC
FCF
$29.3bA
+12.7%B+
Rev
+46.8%A
0.57C+
D/E
0.07B+
22.5xB+
P/E
10.0xA
0.76A-
PEG
0.31A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
AMKR
SKHY
655% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
194% above
>60%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~47%/yr
-88%
1-yr DCF upside
-74%
-87%
5-yr DCF upside
-66%
-85%
10-yr DCF upside
-52%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
AMKR
Why this score
  • Cut its dividend
SKHY
Why this score
  • Short track record
  • Foreign reporter (KRW)
AMKRAmkor Technology, Inc.
Semiconductor Equipment & Materials · $50.26 · beta 2.25
Why now
Semiconductor Equipment & Materials · market cap $12.5b. Down 48% from 52-week high of $96.68 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +13%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.76 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 9 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $77.11 (implying +53% upside).
Moat
Semiconductor moat is process-design IP plus customer qualification timelines — once designed in, the company captures multiple product cycles before a competitor can displace.
Risk
Down 48% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 2.25 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Production-cost sensitivity — top-quartile cost producers generate cash through the cycle while marginal producers burn it; watch the cost-per-unit trend, not just headline revenue.
SKHYSK hynix Inc.
Semiconductors · $163.41 · beta 2.41
Why now
Semiconductors · market cap $1.2T. 16% off the 52-week high of $194.80. Revenue growing +47% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.31 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $245.43 (implying +50% upside).
Moat
Net margin 86% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 93% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. $1.2T market cap places it among the largest companies in the sector — distribution, R&D, and customer-acquisition costs amortize across a base peers can't replicate.
Risk
Beta 2.41 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Semiconductor cyclicality — inventory corrections compress margins faster than analysts model. Monitor channel inventory and book-to-bill ratios as leading indicators.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where AMKR and SKHY diverge

On the headline score the gap is 14.0 points in favor of SKHY. The widest single difference is Quality, where SKHY leads by 41.8 points.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.