Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. AMH scored 74.0, SUI scored 71.0 — AMH leads.
Compare another set
AMH
American Homes 4 Rent
REIT - Residential · Financial strength
72.8Fin
$30.63 · $12.6B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
21.2
AMH leads
SUI
Sun Communities, Inc.
REIT - Residential · Financial strength
51.6Fin
$112.95 · $14.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
Fastest growthAMH+7.0%
Strongest balance sheetAMH0.69
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Fundamentals, head-to-head
AMH
SUI
4.3%B+
Yield
3.9%B+
+7.0%B
Rev
+0.8%C
0.69B+
D/E
0.73B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
The companies
AMHAmerican Homes 4 Rent
REIT - Residential · $30.63 · beta 0.79
Why now
REIT - Residential · market cap $12.6b. 13% off the 52-week high of $35.07. 22 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $37.11 (implying +21% upside).
Moat
Net margin 26% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close.
Risk
Dividend payout 100% of earnings on a 4.3% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. ROE 7% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
SUISun Communities, Inc.
REIT - Residential · $112.95 · beta 0.76
Why now
REIT - Residential · market cap $14.3b. 18% off the 52-week high of $137.85. 19 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $137.79 (implying +22% upside).
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
Currently unprofitable (margin -37.4%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Common questions
Is AMH or SUI the better stock?
AMH scores higher: AMH 74.0, SUI 71.0 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
How are AMH and SUI scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.