COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
AMCR vs GEF-B
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. AMCR scored 67.9, GEF-B scored 54.3 — AMCR leads.
Compare another set
AMCR
Amcor plc
67.9
$48.59 · $22.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
13.6
AMCR leads
GEF-B
Greif, Inc.
54.3
$111.43 · $4.2B
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestAMCR20.4x
- Fastest growthAMCR+56.6%
- Strongest balance sheetGEF-B0.39
- Highest qualityGEF-B59 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueAMCR-23%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
AMCR
stronger →← stronger
GEF-B
54
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
59
89
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
57
64
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
48
AMCR is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
AMCR
GEF-B
$1.2bC+
FCF
$188mC
+56.6%A
Rev
+4.3%C+
1.28B
D/E
0.39A-
20.4xB
P/E
30.7xC
1.07B+
PEG
0.67A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
AMCR
GEF-B
23% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
6% above
~-1%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~8%/yr
+23%
1-yr DCF upside
-14%
+30%
5-yr DCF upside
-6%
+40%
10-yr DCF upside
+9%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
AMCR
No notable signals flagged.
GEF-B
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
The companies
AMCRAmcor plc
Why now
Packaging & Containers · market cap $22.5b. 5% off the 52-week high of $50.94. Revenue growing +57% — in hypergrowth territory. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $49.93 (implying +3% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 111% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Dividend payout 109% of earnings on a 5.5% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. Net margin 4.7% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
GEF-BGreif, Inc.
Why now
Packaging & Containers · market cap $4.2b. Trading near 52-week high of $113.99 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. PEG 0.67 — paying under fair value for the growth rate.
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
Trading within 2% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction. Trailing P/E 31x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where AMCR and GEF-B diverge
On the headline score the gap is 13.6 points in favor of AMCR. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthAMCR 89.4 · GEF-B 56.5AMCR +32.9
- ValueAMCR 64.4 · GEF-B 48.2AMCR +16.2
- QualityAMCR 54.4 · GEF-B 58.9GEF-B +4.5
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.