Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. AMCR scored 70.9, GEF-B scored 48.3 — AMCR leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. AMCR's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but GEF-B's are as of July 2025 — a 11-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
AMCR
Amcor plc
Packaging & Containers · Quality-Growth
70.9
$41.72 · $19.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
22.6
AMCR leads
GEF-B
Greif, Inc.
Packaging & Containers · Quality-Growth
48.3
$108.04 · $4.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestAMCR17.5x
Fastest growthAMCR+56.6%
Strongest balance sheetGEF-B0.39
Highest qualityGEF-B66 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueAMCR-39%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
AMCR
stronger →← stronger
GEF-B
54
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
66
81
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
57
82
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
30
AMCR is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
AMCR
GEF-B
$1.2bC+
FCF
$335mC
+56.6%A
Rev
+4.3%C+
1.28B
D/E
0.39A-
17.5xB
P/E
32.6xC
0.96B+
PEG
0.67A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
AMCR
GEF-B
39% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
32% below
~-4%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~-5%/yr
+50%
1-yr DCF upside
+46%
+63%
5-yr DCF upside
+47%
+84%
10-yr DCF upside
+49%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
AMCR
No notable signals flagged.
GEF-B
Why this score
Raising its dividend
The companies
AMCRAmcor plc
Packaging & Containers · $41.72 · beta 0.58
Why now
Packaging & Containers · market cap $19.3b. 18% off the 52-week high of $50.94. Revenue growing +57% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.96 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $49.76 (implying +19% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 111% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Dividend payout 109% of earnings on a 6.2% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. Net margin 4.7% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
GEF-BGreif, Inc.
Packaging & Containers · $108.04 · beta 0.79
Why now
Packaging & Containers · market cap $4.1b. 6% off the 52-week high of $114.64. PEG 0.67 — paying under fair value for the growth rate.
Moat
Net margin 25% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. FCF converts 147% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Trailing P/E 33x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where AMCR and GEF-B diverge
On the headline score the gap is 22.6 points in favor of AMCR. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
ValueAMCR 81.6 · GEF-B 30.4AMCR +51.2
GrowthAMCR 81.3 · GEF-B 56.5AMCR +24.8
QualityAMCR 53.6 · GEF-B 65.8GEF-B +12.2
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is AMCR or GEF-B the better stock?
AMCR scores higher: AMCR 70.9, GEF-B 48.3 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do AMCR and GEF-B differ most?
The widest gap is value, where AMCR leads by 51 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.
How are AMCR and GEF-B scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.