Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. AMCR scored 70.9, CCK scored 60.9 — AMCR leads.
Compare another set
AMCR
Amcor plc
Packaging & Containers · Quality-Growth
70.9
$41.72 · $19.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
10.0
AMCR leads
CCK
Crown Holdings, Inc.
Packaging & Containers · Quality-Growth
60.9
$108.26 · $11.8B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestCCK15.6x
Fastest growthAMCR+56.6%
Strongest balance sheetAMCR1.28
Highest qualityCCK78 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueCCK-59%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
AMCR
stronger →← stronger
CCK
54
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
78
81
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
54
82
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
54
AMCR is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
AMCR
CCK
$1.2bC+
FCF
$1.2bC+
+56.6%A
Rev
+4.8%C+
1.28B
D/E
1.86C+
17.5xB
P/E
15.6xB+
0.96B+
PEG
0.64A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
AMCR
CCK
39% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
59% below
~-4%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~-15%/yr
+50%
1-yr DCF upside
+135%
+63%
5-yr DCF upside
+141%
+84%
10-yr DCF upside
+150%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
AMCR
No notable signals flagged.
CCK
Why this score
Buying back stock
Raising its dividend
The companies
AMCRAmcor plc
Packaging & Containers · $41.72 · beta 0.58
Why now
Packaging & Containers · market cap $19.3b. 18% off the 52-week high of $50.94. Revenue growing +57% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.96 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $49.76 (implying +19% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 111% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Dividend payout 109% of earnings on a 6.2% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. Net margin 4.7% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
CCKCrown Holdings, Inc.
Packaging & Containers · $108.26 · beta 0.56
Why now
Packaging & Containers · market cap $11.8b. 12% off the 52-week high of $122.91. PEG 0.64 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 14 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $134.93 (implying +25% upside).
Moat
ROE 27% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 153% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
CCK leads AMCR by 7 points (75.5 to 68.5), its sharpest advantage coming in P/E (grade B+). A contrarian could still prefer AMCR, which trades about 37% below our DCF fair value — a margin of safety the score doesn't reward.
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where AMCR and CCK diverge
On the headline score the gap is 10.0 points in favor of AMCR. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
ValueAMCR 81.6 · CCK 53.9AMCR +27.7
GrowthAMCR 81.3 · CCK 54.0AMCR +27.3
QualityAMCR 53.6 · CCK 77.7CCK +24.1
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is AMCR or CCK the better stock?
AMCR scores higher: AMCR 70.9, CCK 60.9 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do AMCR and CCK differ most?
The widest gap is value, where AMCR leads by 28 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.
How are AMCR and CCK scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.