COMPARE · Reviewed July 29, 2026
ALV vs LEA
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ALV scored 64.5, LEA scored 46.0 — ALV leads.
Compare another set
ALV
Autoliv, Inc.
64.5
$124.05 · $9.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
18.5
ALV leads
LEA
Lear Corp
46
$145.52 · $7.3B
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ALV
stronger →← stronger
LEA
80
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
61
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
43
67
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
37
ALV is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ALV
LEA
$757mC+
FCF
$732mC+
+5.9%C+
Rev
+2.8%C
0.88B
D/E
0.54B+
14.6xA-
P/E
14.1xB+
0.85B+
PEG
4.95D
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ALV
LEA
22% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
19% below
~4%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-2%/yr
+8%
1-yr DCF upside
+23%
+28%
5-yr DCF upside
+23%
+61%
10-yr DCF upside
+22%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ALV
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
- Cyclical growth
LEA
Why this score
- Buying back stock
The companies
ALVAutoliv, Inc.
Why now
Auto Parts · market cap $9.1b. 6% off the 52-week high of $132.17. PEG 0.85 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 17 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $134.71 (implying +9% upside).
Moat
ROE 26% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 118% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
LEALear Corp
Why now
Auto Components · market cap $7.3b. 3% off the 52-week high of $150.33.
Moat
ROE 10% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Net margin 2.3% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.