COMPARE · Data as of August 13, 2026
ALV vs DORM
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ALV scored 65.4, DORM scored 63.4 — ALV leads.
Compare another set
ALV
Autoliv, Inc.
65.4
$121.41 · $8.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
2.0
ALV leads
DORM
Dorman Products, Inc.
63.4
$133.08 · $3.9B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ALV
stronger →← stronger
DORM
80
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
72
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
70
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
71
ALV is stronger on 1 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ALV
DORM
$757mC+
FCF
$214mC
+5.9%C+
Rev
+3.3%C+
0.88B
D/E
0.35A-
14.3xA-
P/E
18.5xB
0.85B+
PEG
1.17B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ALV
DORM
21% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
13% above
~4%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~8%/yr
+8%
1-yr DCF upside
-17%
+26%
5-yr DCF upside
-12%
+56%
10-yr DCF upside
-5%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ALV
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
- Cyclical growth
DORM
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
- Cyclical growth
The companies
ALVAutoliv, Inc.
Why now
Auto Parts · market cap $8.9b. 8% off the 52-week high of $132.17. PEG 0.85 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 17 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $134.71 (implying +11% upside).
Moat
ROE 26% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 118% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
DORMDorman Products, Inc.
Why now
Auto Parts · market cap $3.9b. Down 20% from 52-week high of $166.89 — deep drawdown territory. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $162.38 (implying +22% upside).
Moat
ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 98% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ALV and DORM diverge
On the headline score the gap is 2.0 points in favour of ALV. The widest single difference is Quality, where ALV leads by 7.5 points.
- QualityALV 79.7 · DORM 72.2ALV +7.5
- ValueALV 70.2 · DORM 70.5level
- GrowthALV 50.0 · DORM 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.