COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
ALSN vs ALV
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ALSN scored 58.2, ALV scored 65.4 — ALV leads.
Compare another set
ALSN
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
58.2
$133.23 · $11.0B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
7.2
ALV leads
ALV
Autoliv, Inc.
65.4
$125.37 · $9.2B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestALV14.8x
- Fastest growthALSN+37.6%
- Strongest balance sheetALV0.88
- Highest qualityALV80 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueALSN-21%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ALSN
stronger →← stronger
ALV
74
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
80
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
53
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
70
ALV is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ALSN
ALV
$737mC+
FCF
$757mC+
+37.6%A
Rev
+5.9%C+
2.12C
D/E
0.88B
21.1xB
P/E
14.8xA-
0.66A-
PEG
0.85B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ALSN
ALV
21% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
18% below
~3%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~5%/yr
+11%
1-yr DCF upside
+5%
+27%
5-yr DCF upside
+22%
+54%
10-yr DCF upside
+51%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ALSN
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
- Cyclical growth
ALV
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
- Cyclical growth
The companies
ALSNAllison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Auto Parts · market cap $11.0b. 3% off the 52-week high of $137.62. Revenue growing +38% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.66 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $139.40 (implying +5% upside).
Moat
Net margin 12% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 27% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 139% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
D/E 2.12 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer.
ALVAutoliv, Inc.
Why now
Auto Parts · market cap $9.2b. 5% off the 52-week high of $132.17. PEG 0.85 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 17 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $134.71 (implying +7% upside).
Moat
ROE 26% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 118% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ALSN and ALV diverge
On the headline score the gap is 7.2 points in favor of ALV. The widest single difference is Value, where ALV leads by 16.6 points.
- ValueALSN 53.5 · ALV 70.1ALV +16.6
- QualityALSN 73.7 · ALV 79.8ALV +6.1
- GrowthALSN 50.0 · ALV 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.