COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026

ALRM vs PCTY

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ALRM scored 69.9, PCTY scored 81.9 — PCTY leads.
Compare another set
ALRM
Alarm.com Holdings, Inc.
Software - Application · Quality-Growth
69.9
$57.62 · $2.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
12.0
PCTY leads
PCTY
Paylocity Holding Corporation
Software - Application · Quality-Growth
81.9
$153.34 · $8.5B
fundamentals as of
  • CheapestALRM25.5x
  • Fastest growthPCTY+12.2%
  • Strongest balance sheetPCTY0.11
  • Highest qualityPCTY92 / 100
  • Largest discount to fair valueALRM-23%
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD69.9/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY65.9GROWTH78.7VALUE65.8
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD81.9/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY92.3GROWTH87.3VALUE68.0
ALRMPCTYQuality65.992.3Growth78.787.3Value65.868.0
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)-1%22%20x36xALRMPCTY

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

FCFALRM$188mPCTY$497m
RevALRM+8.7%PCTY+12.2%
D/EALRM0.62PCTY0.11
P/EALRM25.5xPCTY31.2x
PEGALRM1.41PCTY1.21
ALRM
stronger →← stronger
PCTY
66
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
92
79
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
87
66
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
68
PCTY is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
ALRM
PCTY
$188mC
FCF
$497mC
+8.7%B
Rev
+12.2%B+
0.62C+
D/E
0.11B+
25.5xB+
P/E
31.2xB
1.41B
PEG
1.21B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
ALRM
PCTY
23% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
3% below
~-1%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~7%/yr
+24%
1-yr DCF upside
-7%
+29%
5-yr DCF upside
+3%
+37%
10-yr DCF upside
+20%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
ALRM
No notable signals flagged.
PCTY
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
  • Durable high returns
ALRMAlarm.com Holdings, Inc.
Software - Application · $57.62 · beta 0.76
Why now
Software - Application · market cap $2.8b. Trading near 52-week high of $59.38 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. 5 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $63.00 (implying +9% upside).
Moat
ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 160% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined. Software economics — recurring revenue, embedded customer workflows, and high gross margin all compound the moat once a base account is won. Switching costs are the lever.
Risk
Trading within 3% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction. Software — competitive moat is durable until it isn't; watch net revenue retention, gross margin trends, and any new market entrant with a fundamentally lower price point.
PCTYPaylocity Holding Corporation
Software - Application · $153.34 · beta 0.43
Why now
Software - Application · market cap $8.5b. 16% off the 52-week high of $182.36. Revenue growing +12%, comfortably above the S&P median. 19 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $172.00 (implying +12% upside).
Moat
Net margin 16% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 22% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 184% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 31x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. AI-native re-pricing — GPT-class models are compressing the cost of features that took years to build; the moat thesis depends on owning the workflow, not just the feature set.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where ALRM and PCTY diverge

On the headline score the gap is 12.0 points in favor of PCTY. The widest single difference is Quality, where PCTY leads by 26.4 points.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.