COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
AGI vs SLVM
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. AGI scored 69.5, SLVM scored 34.3 — AGI leads.
Compare another set
AGI
Alamos Gold Inc.
69.5
$38.73 · $16.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
35.2
AGI leads
SLVM
Sylvamo Corp
34.3
$36.79 · $1.5B
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestAGI13.9x
- Fastest growthAGI+34.3%
- Strongest balance sheetAGI0.05
- Highest qualityAGI84 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
AGI
stronger →← stronger
SLVM
84
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
54
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
15
80
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
51
AGI is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
AGI
SLVM
$288mC
FCF
$10mC-
+34.3%A
Rev
-9.3%D
0.05A-
D/E
0.88B
13.9xA-
P/E
15.2xB+
0.40A
PEG
—
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
AGI
SLVM
204% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
913% above
~46%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~60%/yr
-75%
1-yr DCF upside
-89%
-67%
5-yr DCF upside
-90%
-52%
10-yr DCF upside
-92%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
AGI
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Cyclical growth
SLVM
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
AGIAlamos Gold Inc.
Why now
Gold · market cap $16.2b. Down 30% from 52-week high of $55.41 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +34% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.40 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 4 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $46.25 (implying +19% upside).
Moat
Net margin 49% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 20% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. Mining moat is reserve quality + extraction cost per unit — top-quartile cost producers generate cash through the commodity cycle while marginal producers burn it.
Risk
Down 30% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Reserve-replacement treadmill — every barrel or ounce extracted has to be replaced through exploration or acquisition; underspending on replacement reserves shows up in production declines 2-3 years out.
SLVMSylvamo Corp
Why now
Paper & Forest · market cap $1.5b. Down 35% from 52-week high of $56.80 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue -9% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating.
Moat
ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Revenue contracting -9% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Down 35% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Net margin 3.1% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where AGI and SLVM diverge
On the headline score the gap is 35.2 points in favor of AGI. The widest single difference is Growth, where AGI leads by 35.3 points.
- GrowthAGI 50.0 · SLVM 14.7AGI +35.3
- QualityAGI 83.7 · SLVM 54.2AGI +29.5
- ValueAGI 80.3 · SLVM 50.8AGI +29.5
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.